2016年11月5日亚洲写作真题回忆及解析

　　11月5日的SAT考试不知道小伙伴们考的怎么样？这里上海新航道SAT培训教研组为大家带来了本次的亚太SAT写作真题和解析！

　　2016年11月5日亚洲写作真题考察了一篇环保题材的文章，选自Godfrey Harris 和Daniel Stiles的The Wrong Way to Protect Elephants，2014年3月27日发表于New YorkTimes，未经出题方改动的原文字数为856，原文链接：https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/opinion/the-wrong-way-to-protect-elephants.html

　　学生对难度的反映：学生反应读懂这篇文章比较简单，没有出现太多生词，但是因为其结构上难以捉摸，所以对于文章的总结有困难，比较具有挑战性;论据(evidence)和选词(word choice)定位比较简单。

　　话题种类：环保类话题，官方OG已经出过相关的话题文章，比如说OG的第四篇“Let there be dark”，以及OG的篇“National Arctic Wildlife Refuge”环境类话题不管是针对普通高中、国际高中或者美高的学生来说，都是比较常见的。但是这个话题下面的小话题：象牙倒是不常见，不过可以通过对于环境保护一类的常识进行理解。

　　SAT备考建议

　　词汇准备方面：因为SAT写作的词汇都不会太难，但是会出现话题词汇，所以大家在话题词汇上面的准备可以多一些。主要涉及比如教育，环境保护，人权等等话题都可以准备。

　　需要下载2016年SAT真题的同学，请：2016年10月1日亚太SAT真题PDF下载、完整版2016年10月1日北美SAT真题快来下载、2016年5月北美新SAT真题及答案下载、2016年5月亚太地区完整版新SAT真题下载

　　需要下载可汗学院SAT真题的同学，请：可汗学院SAT真题资料下载汇总（持续更新中）

　　2016年11月5日亚洲写作真题回忆原文如下：

　　THE year was 1862. Abraham Lincoln was in the White House. “Taps” was first sounded as a lights-out bugle call. And Steinway & Sons was building its first upright pianos in New York.

　　The space-saving design would help change the cultural face of America. After the Civil War, many middle-class families installed them in their parlors. The ability to play the piano was thought to be nearly as important to the marriage potential of single ladies as their skill in cooking and sewing, signaling a young woman’s gentility and culture.

　　The keys on those pianos were all fashioned from the ivory of African elephants. And that is why one of these uprights, the oldest one known to survive, in fact, is stuck in Japan.

　　The director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service recently issued an order prohibiting the commercial importation of all African elephant ivory into the United States. (Commercial imports had been allowed in some instances, including for certain antiques.)

　　The Obama administration is also planning to implement additional rules that will prohibit, with narrow exceptions, both the export of African elephant ivory and its unfettered trade within the United States.

　　The Fish and Wildlife Service has said that these new rules will help stop the slaughter of elephants. But we believe that unless demand for ivory in Asia is reduced — through aggressive education programs there, tougher enforcement against the illegal ivory trade and the creation of a legal raw ivory market — these new American regulations will merely cause the price to balloon and the black market to flourish, pushing up the profit potential of continued poaching.

　　In short, these new rules proposed by the Fish and Wildlife Service may well end up doing more harm than good to the African elephant.

　　What these regulations will also do is make the import, export and interstate sale of almost any object with African elephant ivory virtually impossible. Anyone who owns any antique African elephant ivory — whether it is an Edwardian bracelet inherited from a grandmother or an ivory-handled Georgian silver tea set owned by an antiques dealer — will be unable to ship or sell it without unimpeachable documentation that proves it is at least 100 years old, has not been repaired or modified with elephant ivory since 1973, and that it arrived in the United States through one of 13 ports of entry.

　　The story of the Steinway underscores the complexity, rigidity and absurdity of these rules. The piano was salvaged years ago by Ben Treuhaft, a professional piano technician. When his wife took an academic job in Japan, he shipped the piano along with their other household possessions to Tokyo. They moved to Scotland after the Fukushima nuclear accident three years ago, leaving the piano in storage in Japan to be shipped later. Now Mr. Treuhaft is ready to return the piano to the United States and place it in the hands of a friend who planned to display it at her piano shop.

　　But the piano remains in Japan. It lacks the paperwork necessary to clear customs in the United States because Mr. Treuhaft failed, when he shipped the piano abroad, to obtain the required export permit identifying the ivory keys and the piano’s provenance. In the past, the government might have exercised some discretion over Mr. Treuhaft’s oversight. But no more. Moreover, to meet the personal-use exception for an import, the piano would have to be shipped back as part of a household move, and he wants to send it to a friend.

　　So the piano that Steinway says is its oldest known upright is stuck in Japan.

　　Of course, Mr. Treuhaft is not the only one who is or will be hurt or inconvenienced by this draconian order from the Fish and Wildlife Service, or the new rules that the administration seeks to impose. Musicians already complain of a burdensome process and monthslong delays in securing permits to take their instruments containing ivory abroad. And collectors, gun owners and antiques dealers say they have been blindsided by the proposed rules, which will effectively render their African elephant ivory pieces worthless unless they can meet the extremely difficult standards necessary to sell them.

　　We suggest a different approach. We should encourage China, where much of the poached ivory ends up, to start a detailed public education campaign that underscores the damage done to elephant populations by the illegal trade in ivory.

　　We also need more aggressive enforcement of anti-poaching efforts in Africa. And we should figure out a way to manage the trade in raw ivory to protect elephants. For instance, several years ago, ivory stockpiles owned by several African countries were sold in a series of United Nations-approved auctions in an effort to undercut illegal ivory trafficking. The proceeds went to elephant conservation efforts. This is a better approach than destroying these stockpiles, as the United States did last fall to six tons of ivory.

　　Leaving Mr. Treuhaft’s piano in Japan will not save African elephants. But it will further endanger them and diminish the lives of those who recognize and value the role of ivory in history and culture.